Pot Stirrer: A person who feels it necessary to try and create more drama in regards to a situation/arguement/debate in which they are an outside observer. Usually by way of a comment or statement.
One who causes unrest; one who stirs the pot.
"She was a stirrer of the pot, a lover of intrigue and distress, a creature who seemed to draw oxygen from the spectacle of people at each other's throat,
everybody in a state of upset and talking about her." - David Gilmore
"Just keep stirring the pot, you never know what will come up." - Lee Atwater
"I like stirring the pot - I think it's part of my duty, to shake people up a bit - make them look at things in a different way." - Nina Bawden
"I like stirring things up. I'm on the side of the kids more than I am on the adults.
And occasionally I find some adults that have that same mischievous streak, so I don't get in too much trouble." - William Joyce
More of My Pot Stirring
Other Pot Stirring Sites
"Contact" Me - Please
There are numerous CONSERVATIVE web sites to which we can turn for the truth, the unedited story. Such web sites as Flopping Aces do a tremendous job of disseminating our thoughts, perspectives, and opinions. They provide facts that allow us to form our opinions based upon the complete story. Unlike most of the MSM. There are, of course, exceptions (Fox comes to mind), but the vast majority of the MSM promulgates liberal hypocrisy, half-truths, and out-and-out lies (Chris Matthews of leg tingle fame comes to mind).
Even though there are numerous conservative web sites, only conservatives (for the most part) visit them. Liberals who comment are quickly shown to be thinking un-critically. We conservatives are "preaching to the choir." We need to expand our horizons.
What got me thinking along these lines was Sarah Palin's comment about Pope Francis' recent remarks, and Bill Maher's reaction. And the MSM non-reaction to Martin Bashir's remarks.
Pope Francis said:
In this context, some people continue to defend trickle-down theories which assume that economic growth, encouraged by a free market, will inevitably succeed in bringing about greater justice and inclusiveness in the world. This opinion, which has never been confirmed by the facts, expresses a crude and naïve trust in the goodness of those wielding economic power and in the sacralized workings of the prevailing economic system. Meanwhile, the excluded are still waiting. [emphasis mine]
Was Pope Francis referring to the "trickle-down" theory as crude and naïve? If so, his economic expert credentials were omitted. "This opinion, which has never been confirmed by the facts ...[.]" Gee, the Pope was quick to offer HIS opinion. I could not find any reference to substantiate the Pope's opinion. Yet the MSM reported the Pope's opinon as if it was fact. Personal note: my intent here is not to attack Catholics (I'm married to one), but to illustrate that the Pope has an agenda.
To which Palin responded:
He's had some statements that to me sound kind of liberal, has taken me aback, has kind of surprised me. There again, unless I really dig deep into what his messaging is, and do my own homework, I'm not going to just trust what I hear in the media.
I'm kinda trying to follow what his agenda is. You know he came out with a couple of things in the media but again I'm not one to trust the media's interpretation of somebody's message but having read through media outlets.
Palin then, as interpreted by the MSM, "apologized" for her remarks.
It was not my intention to be critical of Pope Francis. I was reminding viewers that we need to do our own homework on news subjects, and I hadn't done mine yet on the Pope's recent comments as reported by the media. Knowing full well how often the media mischaracterizes a person's comments (especially a religious leader's), I don't trust them to get it right when it comes to reporting on the Vatican.
I apologize for not being clearer in my response, thus opening the door to critical media that does what it does best in ginning up controversy. [emphasis mine]
Bill Maher, ignoring Palin's comments about not trusting the media's interpretation, had to interject his opinion into this situation. Maher said, "Well, if she thinks Pope Francis is liberal, wait until she sees what Jesus has been saying." Maher then presented a series of tweets that he claimed was exchanged between the Pope and Palin. The tweets were supposed to (I guess) be funny, but they weren't, and further illustrated Maher's opinion. Maher never got around to the crux of what Palin said about not trusting the MSM. Nor did he get around to citing what Jesus said, as illustrated below. I'm pretty sure Maher has not read it. And, Maher never got around to saying that the Pope was offering an unauthenticated opinion. Typical liberal.
I guess Pope Francis needs to be reminded about what Jesus said to the Pharisees in Matthew 22: 15-21.
15 Then the Pharisees went out and laid plans to trap him in his words.
16 They sent their disciples to him along with the Herodians. "Teacher," they said, “we know that you are a man of integrity and that you teach the way of God in accordance with the truth. You aren't swayed by others, because you pay no attention to who they are.
17 Tell us then, what is your opinion? Is it right to pay the imperial tax to Caesar or not?"
18 But Jesus, knowing their evil intent, said, "You hypocrites, why are you trying to trap me?
19 Show me the coin used for paying the tax." They brought him a denarius,
20 and he asked them, "Whose image is this? And whose inscription?"
21 "Caesar's," they replied. Then he said to them, "So give back to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's."
Jesus was saying that politics and religion don't mix - PERIOD. Politics (and politicians) FORCES its agenda upon us. We Christians (and other religions) CHOOSE to act charitably.
If there was ever a single Biblical passage that shows Pope Francis to have a liberal agenda, this is it. But does the MSM choose to interpret Pope Francis' remarks thusly? In the immortal word of John Belushi on SNL: "Nooooooooooooooooooooo!" So, again the MSM edits, chooses only what will further its agenda. If the MSM and liberal web sites are presented with this, they, like ostriches, stick there heads in the sand in order to ignore unpleasant facts or situations.
It's little things, like the Pope's statement of opinion, that make liberals easy to trip up (if they ever decide to listen and think about what they've heard). "Don't bother me with facts, my mind is made up" is their usual response.
So, in an effort to stop "preaching to the choir," if any FA readers know of some liberal web sites where we can comment, we need to know them. One of my favorites is BlogCritics.org, but I hate to give them any publicity. And if any readers know how to get liberals, once they have been presented the truth, to acknowledge it, we need to know that as well. Alas, I'm afraid that it will never happen, that DrJohn is correct: "... nothing in life is guaranteed. Except for liberals being foolish." But hope springs eternal.
But that's just my opinion.